Review: <i>Enseigner l’architecture aux Beaux-Arts (1863–1968): Entre reformes et traditions</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| June 01 2023 Review: Enseigner l’architecture aux Beaux-Arts (1863–1968): Entre réformes et traditions Amandine Diener Enseigner l’architecture aux Beaux-Arts (1863–1968): Entre réformes et traditions Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2022, 420 pp., 125 b/w illus. €32, ISBN 9782753582799 Barry Bergdoll Barry Bergdoll Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2023) 82 (2): 216–217. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.2.216 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Barry Bergdoll; Review: Enseigner l’architecture aux Beaux-Arts (1863–1968): Entre réformes et traditions. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 June 2023; 82 (2): 216–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.2.216 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search That an upsurge of interest in the history of architectural education at the École des Beaux-Arts should have marked the fiftieth anniversary of the 1968 student protests that catalyzed the dismantling of the French state’s centuries-old centralized system of architectural education might take some by surprise. After all, renewed interest in the school during the 1970s was primarily an Anglo-American affair, centered on the instantly notorious 1975 exhibition The Architecture of the École des Beaux-Arts at New York’s Museum of Modern Art. In France, memories of 1968 were too fresh. Plans to bring MoMA’s show to Paris to finish its tour at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs (after a stopover at the National Gallery of Canada), along with a proposed French translation of curator Arthur Drexler’s monumental catalogue (published only in 1977), all came to naught. The seminal essays in Drexler’s volume by the American trio of Richard Chaffee, David... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".