MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382366749 · doi:10.15421/26220505

The Lower and upper rozprava of the Katerynoslav Vicarage: peculiarities of functioning

2022· article· en· W4382366749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversum Historiae et Archeologiae · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBureaucracyVerdictState (computer science)LegislatureLawQuarter (Canadian coin)CriticismMinor (academic)Period (music)Settlement (finance)Political scienceHistoryArchaeologyPoliticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the article: to characterize the work of the upper and lower rozpravy of the Katerynoslav Governorate which were special state judicial institutions of the last quarter of the 18th century and dealt with the analysis of cases of free settlers, state peasants and categories equated to them. Research methods: historical-comparative, retrospective, method of internal criticism of sources, statistical. Main results. Archival heuristics prove that preserved documentary complexes provide information for forming a general idea of the activities of individual judicial establishments in the 1780s and 1800s. Lacunae, which are not covered by archival materials, can be filled by referring to the general imperial legislative base; to the documents of other institutions that cooperated with the rozpravy. In country court only nobles were elected as assessors to hear the cases of the nobles, but nobles, officials, commoners, and finally, representatives of the villagers could also be elected as the assessors for hearing at rozpravy. A significant part of village assessors was illiterate. Execution judges were appointed from officials. One of the districts which the bureaucratic apparatus of Southern Ukraine was filled from in the specified period were employees of hundred and regiment offices of the former Hetmanship and the Slobidska Ukraine. The vast majority of cases in Katerynoslavska upper and lower district rozpravy belonged to the field of criminal law. Since minor criminal offenses were dealt with in settlements by elders, village elders, more significant offenses were included in the rozpravy. This explains the presence of a significant number of serious criminal offenses under consideration in rozpravy, for example, murder cases were in the range of 30 to 40% out of the total number. Documents of the rozpravy of the Katerynoslav governorate indicate the cases of legal battles between state peasants (often former Cossacks) for land ownership with their landlord neighbors. State judiciary was more often on the side of the landowners, but there were also examples of successful struggle of the rural community as a collective subject of law. Originality: Court cases provide an opportunity to obtain new evidence about peasant everyday life, peasants' understanding of their rights and status, behavioral strategies in new life circumstances. Type of article: research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it