Assessment of the relationship between the incidence of urogenital complaints in young women and pelvic floor muscle weakness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Spinal pain is one of the most common conditions affecting young and middle-aged people and negatively affecting their quality of life.There are missing data about the risk of lumbosacral spine pain in Polish farmers and the lack of up-to-date research, as well as the impact of rehabilitation holidays on lumbosacral spine pain and the level of functional performance.Aims: The study aimed to evaluate the pain complaints and functional performance of patients with lumbosacral spinal pain syndrome before and after a three-week rehabilitation program.The effects of gender, body mass index (BMI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on the incidence of pain and the results of functional tests in the subjects were also compared. Material and methods:The study involved 90 patients undergoing sanatorium treatment who reported low back pain.All subjects were examined twice with three functional tests, and the pain level was assessed using the VAS scale (Measure 1 -before physiotherapy and Measure 2 -3 weeks after physiotherapy).Results: After three weeks of physical therapy, there was a decrease in the average level of perceived pain from 5 (± 1.15) to 4 (± 1.69) in the VAS scale and a slight decrease from 1.16 (± 0.20) to 1.14 (± 0.22) of the mean lower limb symmetry index (SI) in Two Scale Test (TST).The average time needed to perform the Timed Up and Go (TUG) was reduced by 0.82 seconds, and the average distance in the Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) test was reduced by 6.48 cm. Conclusions:The data collected confirms that the three-week rehabilitation camp impacted reducing the level of pain and increasing the level of functional performance.It was also shown that BMI and pain level affected the functional performance tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".