MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382515262 · doi:10.1002/aisy.202300050

EmoSense: Revealing True Emotions Through Microgestures

2023· article· en· W4382515262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Intelligent Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersHong Kong GovernmentHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Emotion detectionCapacitive sensingComputer scienceRandom forestWearable computerArtificial intelligenceEmotion recognitionEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stress is a universally ubiquitous emotional state that takes place everywhere and microgestures (MGs) have been verified to indicate more accurate hidden emotions. However, only limited studies attempted to explore how MGs could reflect stress levels. Herein, EmoSense , an emerging technology for wearable systems containing a three‐layer stress detection mechanism, is proposed: 1) converting the MGs into digital signals; 2) training a machine learning‐based MG detection model; and 3) configuring the stress level based on the MG frequency. To detect the MGs, the swept frequency capacitive sensing technology to is adopted capture the MG signals and the random forest model to detect the MGs effectively is applied. 16 participants are recruited in the pilot study to verify the correlation between stress level and MG frequency. The experimental results further verify that stress level is highly related to other negative emotions that should be studied while handling high stress levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it