MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382516672 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3081771/v1

Xylan derived carbon dots composite with cotton cellulose paper as fluorescence sensor for real time detection Cu2+

2023· preprint· en· W4382516672 on OpenAlexaff
Yingying Zhang, Xiuyuan Feng, Zhiyuan Chen, Xiaoci Cui, Huining Xiao, Ranhua Xiong, Chaobo Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon and Quantum Dots Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFluorescenceCelluloseXylanDetection limitCarbon fibersMaterials scienceComposite numberChemistryNanotechnologyChemical engineeringComposite materialOrganic chemistryChromatographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cotton cellulose paper composited with fluorescence carbon dots (CDs) has shown potential for Cu 2+ detection in environmental monitoring. In this study, a solid-state detection platform was developed using biomass-based fluorescent sensors ( CPU-CDs ) composed of xylan-derived CDs ( U-CDs ) and cotton cellulose paper. The fluorescence platform was nanoengineered to monitor Cu 2+ changes via spectral and colorimetric dual-modal methods. CPU-CDs exhibits reusability, non-toxicity, excellent fluorescence characteristics and biocompatibility. Besides, CPU-CDs has a complex network structure and a large number of hydroxyl and amino groups, which can realize a high loading rate of U-CDs and provide more binding sites for the detection and response of Cu 2+ . CPU-CDs displays high effectiveness and sensitivity for Cu 2+ . Additionally, the detection limit of CPU-CDs for Cu 2+ as low as 0.14 μM that was well below U.S. EPA safety levels (20 μM). Practical application indicated that CPU-CDs could achieve precision response of Cu 2+ change in water environment with recovery range of 90%-119%. This strategy demonstrated a promising biomass solid-state fluorescence sensor for Cu 2+ detection for water treatment research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicCarbon and Quantum Dots ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207