MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382539227 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100310

Advanced Terminal Voltage Control of Self-Excited Induction Generators in Variable-Speed Wind Turbines Using a Three-Level NPC Converter

2023· article· en· W4382539227 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kahina Berabez, Farid Hamoudi, Kassa Idjdarene, Ismail Hacini

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirection Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
KeywordsInduction generatorVoltageWind powerTerminal (telecommunication)Wind speedControl theory (sociology)Electronic speed controlVariable (mathematics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematicsTelecommunicationsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to improve the terminal voltage control of a self-excited induction generator (SEIG) that operates an independent load and is supplied by a wind turbine with variable speed.A three-level neutral point clamped (3L_NPC) converter employing direct torque control (DTC) is utilized to achieve this control.Two strategies are implemented: In the first strategy, the flux is maintained constant, while in the second, the flux varies with the speed.Voltage space vector selection is used to control the electromagnetic torque, stator flux, and induction generator, aiming to reduce torque and flux ripples.The three-level converter, as opposed to the two-level version, offers an increased degree of freedom in voltage vector selection, resulting in enhanced performance.The control strategy being suggested seeks to maintain a consistent voltage level across the DC bus, irrespective of fluctuations in load and wind speed one can effectively regulate the system, by controlling the torque according to the speed.A dynamic model accounting for the saturation effect of magnetic material is developed in the (α-β) frame using the Concordia transform.The effectiveness of the proposed control strategy is validated through simulation tests conducted in Matlab/Simulink.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207