Twig-assisted masturbation in Balinese long-tailed macaques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We documented evidence of idiosyncratic but repeated twig-assisted genital stimulation by Balinese long-tailed macaques ( Macaca fascicularis ), living in Ubud, Indonesia. This population is known to customarily engage in genital stone-tapping/-rubbing, a behaviour expressed by males and females of different age classes as part of a broader cultural repertoire of stone-directed and overall playful actions known as stone handling. However, genital stimulation using other objects has never been reported in this population and species. We observed repeated and extensive twig-assisted genital stimulation in one adult female and one adult male. We also recorded three instances of twig-assisted genital stimulation in three additional individuals. Our results indicate that this behaviour is not accidental and may be sexually motivated; that is, it may be another form of tool-assisted masturbation in this primate population. This report provides a valuable addition to the increasing literature on tool-assisted behavioural innovations pertaining to self-care and possibly pleasure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it