Respite care: qualitative arts-based findings on the perspectives and experiences of families of children and youth with special healthcare needs residing in Manitoba, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Respite for families of children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN) is essential for sustaining a family care environment. Lacking is an understanding of families' respite experiences who reside in Canada. We sought to understand experiences of the use of respite services by families with CYSHCN with the aim to help improve respite services. This paper reports on the qualitative arts-based findings. DESIGN: Manitoba, a western Canadian province. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two families (including 38 parents and 13 siblings) of CYSHCN. RESULTS: We identified six themes surrounding challenges experienced by families' in their journeys accessing, acquiring and navigating the respite care system, and sustainment of respite care for their families, leading to familial burn-out and breakdown, financial stress, unemployment and unaddressed mental health struggles. Families provided multipronged recommendations to address these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Through the lens of Canadian families of children with a range of complex care needs, the qualitative arts-based portion of the study underscores the challenges with accessing, navigating and sustaining respite care, which has implications for CYSHCN, their clinicians and the potential for long-term costs for government and society. This study identifies the state of the current Manitoba respite care system as an issue, presenting actionable recommendations from families that can assist policymakers and clinicians in advocating for and implementing a collaborative, responsive, family-centred system of respite care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".