MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382658048 · doi:10.1109/tte.2023.3291053

Fault Diagnosis of Electric City Bus High-Voltage Load System Based on Multidomain Sparse Representation

2023· article· en· W4382658048 on OpenAlexaff
Xianglong You, Zhongwei Deng, Yalian Yang, Xianke Lin, Xiaosong Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFrequency domainSIGNAL (programming language)Time domainFault (geology)Computer scienceVoltageSparse approximationDomain (mathematical analysis)Feature (linguistics)Representation (politics)Feature vectorAdaBoostPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineEngineeringMathematicsComputer visionElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a system-level fault diagnosis scheme for the high-voltage load system of electric city bus (ECB). First, a predesigned excitation signal generated by the battery system is injected into the high-voltage load system during parking, and the response signal is captured by high-speed data acquisition device. Then, time domain features, frequency domain features, and time-frequency domain features are extracted from the response signal, in addition, novel geometry features are also extracted from the response signal, which are composed of shape features (SF), dynamic performance (DP) indices, and frequency spectrum (FS) features. Further, in time domain, frequency domain, time-frequency domain, and geometry feature domain, the above features extracted from labeled samples are utilized to construct dictionaries, and sparse representation are conducted for testing samples to obtain sparse vectors. Finally, based on AdaBoost, the sparse vectors obtained from the four domains are fused, and the fault diagnosis is realized by analyzing the nonzero elements distribution of the fused sparse vector. Validations for the proposed method are conducted based on datasets obtained from AMESim simulation, ECB test rig, and real ECB, the diagnosis accuracy are 98.33%, 94.00%, and 92.50%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207