MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4382678789 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00505.2022

Chronic testosterone deficiency increases late inward sodium current and promotes triggered activity in ventricular myocytes from aging male mice

2023· article· en· W4382678789 on OpenAlexafffund
Shubham Banga, Manish Mishra, Stefan Heinze-Milne, Hailey J. Jansen, Robert A. Rose, Susan E. Howlett

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaDalhousie University
FundersFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchResearch Nova ScotiaHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaKillam TrustsDalhousie UniversityGovernment of CanadaDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyAfterdepolarizationTestosterone (patch)RanolazineMedicineSodium channelMyocyteRepolarizationChemistryElectrophysiologySodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Older men with low testosterone levels are at increased risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias. We found aged mice chronically exposed to low testosterone had more arrhythmias and ventricular myocytes had prolonged repolarization, abnormal electrical activity, larger late sodium currents, and increased expression of NaV1.8 sodium channels. Drugs that inhibit late sodium current or NaV1.8 channels abolished abnormal electrical activity and shortened repolarization. This suggests the late sodium current may be a novel target to treat arrhythmias in older testosterone-deficient men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→