Computational fluid dynamics simulation and optimization of the fluid flow behaviour in a multi‐stage solar updraft tower using a new chimney design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work proposes a new chimney design that allows for the development of a multi‐stage solar updraft tower (SUT). The new design consists of two successive divergent chimneys. A 3D model was established to inspect the air flow behaviour within the SUT in six configurations: four multi‐stage systems with four divergence angles of the second stage were compared to the simple conventional SUT and the simple SUT with a divergent chimney. The new SUT performs better than the conventional one, while the two‐stage solar tower multiplied the system efficiency. Two high‐velocity zones appeared for the two‐stage SUT, whereas one zone occurred for the conventional system. The velocity in the two zones achieved a significant value, like that of the conventional system. In addition, the second stage's divergence angle directly impacts the velocity value inside the two stages. The static pressure distribution varies with the change in chimney design. The depression area occurs twice for the multi‐stage SUT in the inlet of each stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".