MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382723728 · doi:10.14740/jocmr4919

Colon Cancer Risk Following Intestinal <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

2023· article· en· W4382723728 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David A. Geier, Mark R. Geier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortColorectal cancerInternal medicineCancerIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyClostridium difficile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The gut microbiome may play an important role in the etiology and progression of colon cancer. The present hypothesis-testing study compared the colon cancer incidence rate among adults diagnosed with intestinal Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile (Cdiff) (the Cdiff cohort) to adults not diagnosed with intestinal Cdiff infection (the non-Cdiff cohort). Methods: De-identified eligibility and claim healthcare records within the Independent Healthcare Research Database (IHRD) from a longitudinal cohort of adults (the overall cohort) enrolled in the Florida Medicaid system between 1990 through 2012 were examined. Adults with ? 8 outpatient office visits over 8 years of continuous eligibility were examined. There were 964 adults in the Cdiff cohort and 292,136 adults in the non-Cdiff cohort. Frequency and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. Results: Colon cancer incidence rate in the non-Cdiff cohort remained relatively uniform over the entire study period, whereas a marked increase was observed in the Cdiff cohort within the first 4 years of a Cdiff diagnosis. Colon cancer incidence was significantly increased (about 2.7-fold) in the Cdiff cohort (3.11 per 1,000 person-years) compared to the non-Cdiff cohort (1.16 per 1,000 person-years). Adjustments for gender, age, residency, birthdate, colonoscopy screening, family history of cancer, and personal history of tobacco abuse, alcohol abuse/dependence, drug abuse/dependence, and overweight/obesity, as well as consideration of diagnostic status for ulcerative and infection colitis, immunodeficiency, and personal history of cancer did not significantly change the observed results. Conclusions: This is the first epidemiological study associating Cdiff with an increased risk for colon cancer. Future studies should further evaluate this relationship. J Clin Med Res. 2023;15(6):310-320 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4919

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.242
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207