Frequency of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cervicogenic headache
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Both primary and secondary headaches have been associated with cognitive dysfunction and depression. Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of cervicogenic headache on cognitive function, quality of life and mood. Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional comparative study includes 30 patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache by a neurologist and 30 healthy controls. The pain level of the participants was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), their mood with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, their quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and their cognitive status by a psychologist with the Standard Mini Mental Test (SMMT) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA). Results: All MoCA domains except for orientation and the SMMT scores were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group compared to the control group (p< 0,05). In addition, scores for the pain catastrophizing scale and selected SF-36 sub-parameters (physical function, physical role difficulty, social functionality, pain and general health perception) were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group (p< 0,05). The Beck Depression Inventory score was significantly higher in patients with cervicogenic headache than in the control group (p=0.018). Conclusion: Patients with cervicogenic headache exhibit worse cognitive performance during their headache. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, they had higher rates of depression and pain catastrophizing as well as a lower quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".