Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we study the high-dimensional super-resolution imaging problem. Here, we are given an image of a number of point sources of light whose locations and intensities are unknown. The image is pixelized and is blurred by a known point-spread function arising from the imaging device. We encode the unknown point sources and their intensities via a non-negative measure and we propose a convex optimization program to find it. Assuming the device’s point-spread function is componentwise decomposable, we show that the optimal solution is the true measure in the noiseless case, and it approximates the true measure well in the noisy case with respect to the generalized Wasserstein distance. Our main assumption is that the components of the point-spread function form a Tchebychev system ($T$-system) in the noiseless case and a $T^{*}$-system in the noisy case, mild conditions that are satisfied by Gaussian point-spread functions. Our work is a generalization to all dimensions of the work [14] where the same analysis is carried out in two dimensions. We also extend results in [27] to the high-dimensional case when the point-spread function decomposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".