MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382865067 · doi:10.3138/9781487552312-004

Chapter One. Situating the Study of Sufism in Canada

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382865067 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSufismHistoryGeographyAncient historyArchaeologyIslam

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter situates the fields of scholarship that inform my approach to the study of Sufism in Canada.First, I locate the study of Sufism in Canada within the field of Islam and Muslims in Canada.Any project that thinks and writes about Islam in Canada must start with an account of the first Muslims in Canada, who were enslaved or formerly enslaved Black peoples who had been forced from their African homeland by the transatlantic slave trade.Some of these first Black Muslims in Canada would likely have been the first Sufis.The following discussion is speculative and not the focus of this project; even so, it is vital to begin this account of Sufism and Islam in Canada by acknowledging this history, given that religious studies in Canada is too often framed as Eurocentric.Shifting the focus of the stories we tell is the first step in decolonizing the study of religion in Canada.I then examine how Islam and Muslims are viewed in Canada and locate the study of Sufism within these scholarly literatures (hint: it barely exists).I then explore other areas of study -diaspora, migration, and spirituality -as domains with which the field of Sufism intersects.These various discursive terrains will help locate this present case study, not only in the specific field of Sufism in Canada, which I think of as a subfield that crosses these various literatures, but also in popular spirituality, Islamic studies, and diaspora studies.This chapter then positions the study of Sufism in the global west, drawing from writings about Sufism in North America and western Europe.I examine how scholars have framed Sufism either capaciously or restrictively in their discourses and how this has informed approaches to categorizing various Sufi communities and their practices.Some of these frameworks resort to coded language to label contemporary Sufi communities.The scholarship on contemporary western Sufism overlaps with studies of Islam and Muslim societies and with non-Islamic traditions and popular spirituality.This scholarship ranges from Neoplatonic thought to perennialism and traditionalism, as forms of universalism, while conceptually restrictive studies of Sufism frame it only within Chapter One Situating the Study of Sufism in Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0550.019
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Press eBooksSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207