A fairness‐aware task offloading method in edge‐enabled IIoT with multi‐constraints using AGE‐MOEA and weighted MMF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary By providing distributed and ultra‐low‐latency communication between industrial devices and resource components, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is at the forefront of a new trend. Such a distributed paradigm is viewed as a collection of autonomous computing resources utilized by multiple heterogeneous devices to achieve higher‐quality interconnection and data exchange. However, stringent requirements of exceptional service and fairness guarantees pose many formidable challenges. To this end, this study investigates the aforementioned concerns in an integrated manner and further proposes a fairness‐aware task offloading method, called FOIMAM. Specifically, the ‐norm is introduced to accommodate the Pareto plane under the non‐Euclidean geometry framework while the evaluation and elimination of low‐quality solutions are completed based on survival scores. Particularly, the fairness requirements are formulated as a multi‐constraint problem and resolved using weighted max‐min fairness. Eventually, numerical results indicate that the proposed method brings substantial improvement in both service efficiency and fairness guarantees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".