MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382894879 · doi:10.24176/perseptual.v8i1.9241

Faktor-faktor Penyebab Alexithymia pada Remaja: Literature Review

2023· article· en· W4382894879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I Gusti Ayu Agung Mirah Pradnyadewi, Putu Nugrahaeni Widiasavitri

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Psikologi Perseptual · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStudent Stress and Coping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaPsychologyToronto Alexithymia ScaleClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cases of alexithymia in adolescents in Indonesia increasingly occur. The impact of alexithymia, certainly, significantly affects the quality of life of a teenager. Alexithymia is not a mental disorder, but a phenomenon that can be one of the symptoms of certain mental disorders, thus making the sufferers unable to recognize, feel and identify their emotions. This study aims to determine the factors that cause alexithymia in adolescents. The method used in this study is a literature review concerning alexithymia as the theme. The article search sources were accessed from PubMed and Google Scholar library sources, limiting the years of article publication between 2015-2022. The result of this study is that there are number of factors causing alexithymia, including psychogenic factors (attachment styles, trauma, and chronic illness or pain); biogenic factors (prenatal substances or poisons, and brain structure); primary alexithymia factors (personality); as well as secondary alexithymia factors (stress, anxiety, and fatigue). Kasus alexithymia pada remaja di Indonesia kian marak terjadi. Dampak alexithymia tentunya sangat mempengaruhi kualitas kehidupan seorang remaja. Alexithymia bukanlah suatu gangguan mental, melainkan fenomena yang dapat menjadi salah satu gejala dari gangguan mental tertentu, sehingga membuat penderitanya tidak mampu mengenali, merasakan dan mengidentifikasi emosinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor penyebab alexithymia pada remaja. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yaitu literature review dengan tema alexithymia. Sumber pencarian artikel diakses pada sumber pustaka PubMed dan Google Scholar dengan tahun penerbitan artikel antara tahun 2015-2022. Hasil dari tulisan ini adalah terdapat faktor-faktor penyebab alexithymia, antara lain; faktor psikogenik (gaya kelekatan, trauma, dan penyakit atau nyeri kronis); faktor biogenik (zat-zat atau racun pra-kelahiran, dan struktur otak); faktor alexithymia primer (kepribadian); serta faktor alexithymia sekunder (stres, kecemasan, dan kelelahan)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Psikologi PerseptualSame topicStudent Stress and CopingFrench-language works237,207