Timing in Morphogenesis of the Developing Nervous System: Relation to Genetic Programming and Exogenous Teratogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Timing is essential to morphogenesis of the embryonic and fetal nervous system and intricately associated with onset of expression of developmental genes. Mitotic cell cycles are timed. Teratogenic toxins and other adverse influences are teratogenic in the context of timing by interfering with developmental processes. Each of the 3 axes of the neural tube is associated with two opposing genetic gradients. Many neural malformations can be analyzed pathologically as interference with genetic gradients of one or more of the axes, even if the specific genetic mutation is not yet identified. Examples of cerebral malformations closely associated with defective timing are agenesis of forebrain commissures (anterior and hippocampal commissures form 3 weeks before corpus callosum), neuronogenesis and gliogenesis in disorders of the mTOR signaling pathway (time of expression of postmitotic somatic mutation in relation to the 33 mitotic cycles of neuroepithelium determines extent of lesion of focal cortical dysplasia II or hemimegalencephaly), prosencephalic cleavage and eversion (holoprosencephaly; telencephalic flexure for Sylvian fissure), neuromeric disorders of segmentation of the neural tube (deletion of neuromeres; Chiari I), maturation of individual neurons, synaptogenesis (precocious synaptic circuitry in holoprosencephaly; delayed synapse formation in many genetic/metabolic encephalopathies), myelination (delay in many congenital encephalopathies) and neural crest migrations including craniofacial development (facial dysmorphisms in many genetic syndromes and hypertelorism in some cases of callosal agenesis). Timing of relation of genes in cascade or inhibitory genes acting on others is a key element of normal and abnormal morphogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".