Relationships between neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive profiles in Alzheimer's disease and related syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the rate of occurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and their relationship with age, sex and cognitive performance in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (Alzheimer's disease and related dementias [ADRD]). METHODS: This is a retrospective matched case-control study. Data from memory clinic patients included demographic information presence of NPS, and cognitive testing of Orientation, Immediate and Delayed Memory, Visuospatial Function, Working Memory, Attention, Executive Control and Language. Participants were Individuals with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 352), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 369), vascular MCI (n = 80), Alzheimer's disease (n = 147), vascular dementia (n = 41), mixed dementia (n = 33), and healthy controls (n = 305). Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between the presence of NPS, age and sex. A generalised additive model was used to investigate the relationship between presence of NPS, age and cognitive impairment. Analysis of variance was used to investigate differences in cognition between younger and older groups with and without NPS. RESULTS: We found an increased likelihood of occurrence of NPS in younger individuals and females across cohorts. Anxiety, depression, agitation, and apathy were associated with higher overall rate of NPS. We also found that individuals under 65 years of age with NPS had worse cognitive scores than their counterpart without NPS. CONCLUSION: The younger group with ADRD and NPS had lower cognitive scores, probably reflecting more aggressive neurodegenerative disease. Further work will be needed to elicit the degree to which imaging or mechanistic abnormalities distinguish this group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".