MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382918780 · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15678

Risk factors in children with optic nerve hypoplasia and septo‐optic dysplasia

2023· article· en· W4382918780 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael S. Salman, Chelsea Ruth, Marina Yogendran, Katya Rozovsky, Lisa M. Lix

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaFoundation Fighting Blindness
KeywordsOptic nerve hypoplasiaMedicineOdds ratioOptic nervePopulationPediatricsConfidence intervalDysplasiaSiblingHypoplasiaCase-control studyRetrospective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicineOphthalmologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To identify the risk factors for optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) and septo-optic dysplasia (SOD). METHOD: A retrospective, population-based study with case-control design was undertaken using the Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Center for Health Policy in Manitoba, Canada. Cases were 111 patients (63 males, 48 females; age range 1-35 years [mean 11 years 6 months, SD 7 years 2 months]) with ONH and SOD diagnosed from 1990 to 2019, matched to 555 unrelated population-based controls (315 males, 240 females; age range 1-35 years [mean 11 years 6 months, SD 7 years 2 months]) on year of birth, sex, and area of residence. Additionally, 75 cases (46 males, 29 females; age range 2-35 years [mean 12 years 6 months, SD 7 years 2 months]) with ONH and SOD were matched one-on-one with sibling controls (40 males, 35 females; age range 0-33 years [mean 11 years 7 months, SD 7 years 10 months], the rest did not have siblings). Several antenatal maternal risk factors associated with ONH and SOD were tested for their association with case and control group membership using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from a multivariate conditional logistic regression model. The outcome was the risk of developing ONH and SOD. RESULTS: Maternal age at conception (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86-0.96), primigravida (OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 1.92-6.01), and smoking (OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.61-5.05) were independently associated with ONH and SOD in the cohort matched to unrelated controls (p < 0.001). In the sibling cohort, smoking was an important risk factor (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.2-11.1, p = 0.02). INTERPRETATION: Unmodifiable and modifiable antenatal maternal risk factors are associated with ONH and SOD. Our investigation suggests that several risk factors reported in previous studies may have been due to confounding bias and that maternal smoking during pregnancy is the main modifiable risk factor associated with ONH and SOD. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Historically, many antenatal risk factors have been associated with optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) and septo-optic dysplasia (SOD). Population-based data with matched controls for potential confounding bias are lacking. Young maternal age at conception, primigravida, and smoking during pregnancy are the main risk factors for ONH and SOD using a population-based, case-control design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Medicine & Child NeurologySame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207