The temporal neurovascular coupling response remains intact during sinusoidal hypotensive and hypertensive challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction . Neurovascular coupling (NVC) describes the coupling of neuronal metabolic demand to blood supply, which has shown to be impaired with chronic hypertension, as well as with prolonged hypotension. However, it is unknown the extent the NVC response remains intact during transient hypo- and hyper-tensive challenges. Methods . Fifteen healthy participants (9 females/6 males) completed a visual NVC task (‘ Where’s Waldo? ’) over two testing sessions, consisting of cyclical 30 s eyes closed and opened portions. The Waldo task was completed at rest (8 min) and concurrently during squat-stand maneuvers (SSMs; 5 min) at 0.05 Hz (10 s squat/stand) and 0.10 Hz (5 s squat-stand). SSMs induce 30–50 mmHg blood pressure oscillations, resulting in cyclical hypo- and hyper-tensive swings within the cerebrovasculature, allowing for the quantification of the NVC response during transient hypo- and hyper-tension. Outcome NVC metrics included baseline, peak, relative increase in cerebral blood velocity (CBv), and area-under-the-curve (AUC30) within the posterior and middle cerebral arteries indexed via transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Within-subject, between-task comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with effect size calculations. Results . Differences were noted between rest and SSM conditions in both vessels for peak CBv (all p < 0.045) and the relative increase in CBv (all p < 0.049) with small-to-large effect sizes. AUC30 metrics were similar between all tasks (all p > 0.090) with negligible-to-small effect sizes. Conclusions . Despite the SSMs eliciting ∼30–50 mmHg blood pressure oscillations, similar levels of activation occurred within the neurovascular unit across all conditions. This demonstrated the signaling of the NVC response remained intact during cyclical blood pressure challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".