MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382934541 · doi:10.1111/itor.13333

A decomposition algorithm for multi‐item production planning with independent random demand

2023· article· en· W4382934541 on OpenAlexafffund
Shayan Tavakoli Kafiabad, Masoumeh Kazemi Zanjani, Mustapha Nourelfath

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Transactions in Operational Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalConcordia UniversityCenter for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSubgradient methodMathematical optimizationHeuristicTime horizonComputer scienceLagrangian relaxationTask (project management)Modular designProduction planningDecompositionComponent (thermodynamics)Production (economics)Range (aeronautics)Stochastic programmingAlgorithmMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Production planning in a multiproduct setting where the demands for different items are independent random variables that are also featured with a dynamic behavior over the planning horizon is a challenging task. With a particular focus on maintenance facilities, this study proposes a multistage stochastic programming (MSP) model for operations planning under independent random demand of faulty components in the modular‐structured devices (e.g., gas turbines) received for repair and overhaul services. A Lagrangian relaxation‐based decomposition heuristic is also developed to efficiently solve the problem for real‐size instances. This heuristic relies on decomposing the MSP model into submodels corresponding to component STs and coordinating them via a subgradient algorithm to obtain a high‐quality feasible solution. Our numerical experiments conducted on a range of problem instances endorse the significant value of incorporating demand uncertainty and the effectiveness of the proposed solution methodology in overcoming computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Transactions in Operational ResearchSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207