AFNet Algorithm for Automatic Amniotic Fluid Segmentation from Fetal MRI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amniotic Fluid Volume (AFV) is a crucial fetal biomarker when diagnosing specific fetal abnormalities. This study proposes a novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, AFNet, for segmenting amniotic fluid (AF) to facilitate clinical AFV evaluation. AFNet was trained and tested on a manually segmented and radiologist-validated AF dataset. AFNet outperforms ResUNet++ by using efficient feature mapping in the attention block and transposing convolutions in the decoder. Our experimental results show that AFNet achieved a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 93.38% on our dataset, thereby outperforming other state-of-the-art models. While AFNet achieves performance scores similar to those of the UNet++ model, it does so while utilizing merely less than half the number of parameters. By creating a detailed AF dataset with an improved CNN architecture, we enable the quantification of AFV in clinical practice, which can aid in diagnosing AF disorders during gestation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it