Leveraging Gene Redundancy to Find New Histone Drivers in Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histones play a critical role in chromatin function but are susceptible to mutagenesis. In fact, numerous mutations have been observed in several cancer types, and a few of them have been associated with carcinogenesis. Histones are peculiar, as they are encoded by a large number of genes, and the majority of them are clustered in three regions of the human genome. In addition, their replication and expression are tightly regulated in a cell. Understanding the etiology of cancer mutations in histone genes is impeded by their functional and sequence redundancy, their unusual genomic organization, and the necessity to be rapidly produced during cell division. Here, we collected a large data set of histone gene mutations in cancer and used it to investigate their distribution over 96 human histone genes and 68 different cancer types. This analysis allowed us to delineate the factors influencing the probability of mutation accumulation in histone genes and to detect new histone gene drivers. Although no significant difference in observed mutation rates between different histone types was detected for the majority of cancer types, several cancers demonstrated an excess or depletion of mutations in histone genes. As a consequence, we identified seven new histone genes as potential cancer-specific drivers. Interestingly, mutations were found to be distributed unevenly in several histone genes encoding the same protein, pointing to different factors at play, which are specific to histone function and genomic organization. Our study also elucidated mutational processes operating in genomic regions harboring histone genes, highlighting POLE as a factor of potential interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".