HISTORICAL-GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL TOWNS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF SMALL TOWNS IN ZHAMBYL REGION)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problems of sustainable development of small towns were analyzed from the perspective of historical-geographical factors in this article. During the analysis, we were convinced that monoprofile towns, which are part of the group of small towns, have become the "center" of problems in the world and the country. Theoretical and conceptual analysis of the concepts, names, opinions and conclusions of scientists developed in relation to these cities associated with global industrialization was carried out. The main mechanisms of rehabilitation and support of labor resources in monoprofile towns in a crisis situation were determined on the basis of the experience of the USA, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany and other countries. And in the conditions of our country, we considered on the example of small towns in Zhambyl region. According to it, the historical aspects of specialization of small towns were given importance, classification of common issues limiting sustainable development was compiled. Demographic problems in towns were analyzed, and the place at the strategic stage of the development of innovative city was determined on the basis of historical data and theoretical conclusions. According to the concept of sustainable development, the main areas of urban environment development were selected, and their social, economic and environmental effects were emphasized. In general, the results of the study in the article will complement research in the field of urban geography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".