The future of fish age estimation: deep machine learning coupled with Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy of otoliths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our novel approach for fish age prediction uses quantitative analysis of Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR) spectra of otoliths by means of multimodal convolutional neural networks (MMCNN). We integrate two key data modalities that are related to fish ages: the entire range of wavenumbers of FT-NIR spectra and corresponding biological and geospatial data for nearly 9000 walleye pollock ( Gadus chalcogrammus) specimens. The proposed model extracts informative spectral features automatically and elucidates hidden structural relationships associated with fish growth to improve age predictions. Absorbance associated with 7000 to 4000 cm −1 wavenumbers had the highest influence on model predictions followed by fish length, latitude, depth, and temperature. The optimal model resulted in good overall performance with an R 2 of 0.93 and RMSE of 0.83 for training data set and R 2 of 0.92 and RMSE of 0.91 for test data set. MMCNN's age predictions were comparable to microscope-based ages yielding as good or slightly better precision. Moreover, the model outperformed classical partial least squares analysis of otolith spectra and remedied prediction bias at older ages of fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".