Comprehensive Ontology of Fibroproliferative Diseases: Protocol for a Semantic Technology Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fibroproliferative or fibrotic diseases (FDs), which represent a significant proportion of age-related pathologies and account for over 40% of mortality in developed nations, are often underrepresented in focused research. Typically, these conditions are studied individually, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), rather than as a collective entity, thereby limiting the holistic understanding and development of effective treatments. To address this, we propose creating and publicizing a comprehensive fibroproliferative disease ontology (FDO) to unify the understanding of FDs. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to delineate the study protocol for the creation of the FDO, foster transparency and high quality standards during its development, and subsequently promote its use once it becomes publicly available. METHODS: We aim to establish an ontology encapsulating the broad spectrum of FDs, constructed in the Web Ontology Language format using the Protégé ontology editor, adhering to ontology development life cycle principles. The modeling process will leverage Protégé in accordance with a methodologically defined process, involving targeted scoping reviews of MEDLINE and PubMed information, expert knowledge, and an ontology development process. A hybrid top-down and bottom-up strategy will guide the identification of core concepts and relations, conducted by a team of domain experts based on systematic iterations of scientific literature reviews. RESULTS: The result will be an exhaustive FDO accommodating a wide variety of crucial biomedical concepts, augmented with synonyms, definitions, and references. The FDO aims to encapsulate diverse perspectives on the FD domain, including those of clinicians, health informaticians, medical researchers, and public health experts. CONCLUSIONS: The FDO is expected to stimulate broader and more in-depth FD research by enabling reasoning, inference, and the identification of relationships between concepts for application in multiple contexts, such as developing specialized software, fostering research communities, and enhancing domain comprehension. A common vocabulary and understanding of relationships among medical professionals could potentially expedite scientific progress and the discovery of innovative solutions. The publicly available FDO will form the foundation for future research, technological advancements, and public health initiatives. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/48645.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".