Low incidence of pulmonary hypertension in children with suspected obstructive sleep apnea: A prospective observational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an uncommon but serious perioperative risk factor in children undergoing surgery for adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Routine pre-operative echocardiography is commonly requested if severe OSA is suspected. We investigated the incidence of PH in children with suspected OSA and explored the association between PH and OSA severity. METHODS: A prospective study of children aged 1-13 years with suspected OSA admitted for overnight oximetry (OO) and echocardiography at a pediatric referral hospital in Cape Town, South Africa from 2018 to 2019. OSA severity was defined by McGill Oximetry Score (MOS): MOS 1-2 (mild-moderate) and MOS 3-4 (severe). PH was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥20 mmHg estimated on echocardiographic criteria. Children with congenital heart disease, underlying cardio-respiratory or genetic disorders, and severe obesity were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy children median age 3.8 years (IQR 2.7-6.4) were enrolled and 103 (60%) were female. Twenty-two (14%) had a BMIz >1.0 and 99 (59%) had tonsillar enlargement grade 3/4. One hundred and twenty-two (71%) and 48 (28%) children had mild-moderate and severe OSA, respectively. Echocardiographic assessment for PH was successful in 160 (94%) children of which eight (5%) had PH with mPAP 20.8 mmHg (SD 0.9): six with mild-moderate OSA and two with severe OSA. No significant difference in mPAP and other echocardiographic indices was observed in children with mild-moderate (16.1 mmHg; SD 2.4) and severe OSA (15.7 mmHg; SD 2.1). Similarly, no clinical and OSA severity differences were observed in children with and without PH. CONCLUSION: PH is uncommon in children with uncomplicated OSA and there is no association of PH with severity of OSA measured by OO. Routine echocardiographic screening for PH in children with clinical symptoms of OSA without co-morbidity is unwarranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".