Penjadwalan Housekeepers Hotel Pada Era Pandemi COVID-19 dengan Pendekatan Goal Programming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Housekeepers mempunyai peranan penting dalam oprasional hotel karena kebersihan dan kenyamanan merupakan daya tarik hotel, terutama pada era pandemi COVID-19. Namun, pada saat pandemi banyak industri perhotelan yang mengalami penurunan nilai Tingkat Penghunian Kamar (TPK) sehingga menyebabkan beberapa hotel terpaksa tutup termasuk di wilayah Jawa Barat. Hal tersebut mengakibatkan beberapa pegawai dirumahkan termasuk Housekeepers, maka dari itu penjadwalan harus diatur kembali agar tidak ada pengurangan pegawai. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk menentukan penjadwalan Housekeepers dengan pendekatan Goal Programming di era pandemi COVID-19 studi kasus di Hotel R Kota Bandung. Perbedaan pada saat pandemi COVID-19 ini terdapat pada jumlah Housekeepers yang berbeda dikarenakan ada pengurangan pada saat pandemi, sehingga dapat menambah beban kerja bagi Housekeepers lain. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dari hasil penjadwalan menggunakan software LINGO 11.0 yang disesuaikan dengan fungsi tujuan untuk meminimumkan penyimpangan pada setiap kendala. Dari hasil yang didapatkan diperoleh perbedaan dari jumlah jam kerja serta libur bagi Housekeepers sebelum dan sesudah pandemi COVID-19 akan tetapi memiliki penyimpangan sama dengan nol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it