MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383198235 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxad048

The impact of transition of Spina Bifida Care: A retrospective population-based cohort study comparing outcomes and health care costs longitudinally from adolescence into adulthood

2023· article· en· W4383198235 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Matthew Playfair, James A. McClure, Britney Le, Caitlin Cassidy, Peter Wang, Blayne Welk, Sumit Davé

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioSt Joseph's Health CareParkwood InstituteWestern University
FundersMinistry of Health, Ontario
KeywordsSpina bifidaRetrospective cohort studyMedicineCohortHealth careCohort studyPopulationPediatricsYoung adultDemographyGerontologyEnvironmental healthSurgeryEconomicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Transition from multidisciplinary paediatric to adult care results in a significant change in the intensity of care provided to patients with spina bifida (SB). Objective: To compare planned and unplanned health care utilization and costs of care of transitioning SB patients. Study Design: Through a retrospective population-based cohort study, patients with SB born in Ontario between 1988 and 1999 were studied using routinely collected data analysed at ICES. Patients were followed longitudinally from age 16 to 22 years with comparisons made between the paediatric baseline year (age 16) to the first 3 years of adulthood (ages 19 to 21). A composite primary outcome of unplanned emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations and emergency surgical procedures, was compared before and after transition. Secondary outcomes included these variables individually and estimated health care costs. Results: In the 299 patients, no significant differences were identified in the composite primary outcome between periods (P = 0.09). Unplanned ER visits (P = 0.004) and emergency surgical procedures (P = 0.02) increased after transition. Despite this, the estimated individual total cost of care declined after transition (P = 0.03). Further, multivariable analysis identified rural residence (RR 1.78, confidence interval [CI] 1.30 to 2.44) and previous urologic surgery (RR 1.91, CI 1.41 to 2.57) as significant predictors of increased need for emergent care and health care costs, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with SB in Ontario have higher rates of ER usage and unplanned surgery after the transition to adult care. While this does not drive an increase in health care costs, improvements in the care of transitioned SB patients, particularly rural patients and those with prior urologic surgery, may decrease the requirement for acute care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207