MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383198512 · doi:10.1063/5.0156487

A homotopy analysis method for forced transverse vibrations of simply supported double-beam systems with a nonlinear inner layer

2023· article· en· W4383198512 on OpenAlexaff
Kabutakapua Kakanda, Hongbo Zhu, Musumari Herman, Panick Kalambay, Zhaolong Han, Yan Bao, Mengmeng Zhang, Dai Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPartial differential equationNonlinear systemMathematicsHomotopy analysis methodDeflection (physics)Ordinary differential equationHomotopyMathematical analysisGalerkin methodTransverse planeBeam (structure)Differential equationPhysicsClassical mechanicsStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study introduces a novel algorithm based on the homotopy analysis method (HAM) to efficiently solve the equation of motion of simply supported transversely and axially loaded double-beam systems. The original HAM was developed for single partial differential equations (PDEs); the current formulation applies to systems of PDEs. The system of PDEs is derived by modeling two prismatic beams interconnected by a nonlinear inner layer as Euler–Bernoulli beams. We employ the Bubnov–Galerkin technique to turn the PDEs’ system into a system of ordinary differential equations that is further solved with the HAM. The flexibility and straightforwardness of the HAM in computing time-dependent components of the system’s transverse deflection and natural frequencies, in conjunction with the observed fast convergence, offer a robust semi-analytical method for analyzing such systems. Finally, the transverse deflection is built through the modal superposition principle. Thanks to a judicious and high-flexibility selection of initial guesses and convergence control parameters, numerical examples confirm that at most six iterations are needed to achieve convergence, and the results are consistent with the selected benchmark cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207