MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383220943 · doi:10.7202/1100678ar

Utilisation de la méthode Delphi pour valider deux séquences d’enseignement-apprentissage de la littérature dans le cadre d’une recherche sur les compétences lectorales d’étudiants du cégep

2022· article· fr· W4383220943 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Fednel Alexandre, Judith Émery-­Bruneau, Geneviève Messier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente le processus de validation didactique de deux séquences d’enseignement-apprentissage de la littérature réalisé dans le cadre d’une recherche en éducation. Le recours à la méthode Delphi a permis de consulter un panel d’experts pour assurer la validité didactique des deux séquences. Les résultats issus du processus de validation soulignent la nécessité de valider les ressources didactiques utilisées dans une recherche afin d’en solidifier la scientificité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.549
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207