MAQASID SYARIAH REVIEW OF KOTA BANDA ACEH QANUN NUMBER 3 OF 2021 CONCERNING PARKING SERVICE FEES ON THE EDGE OF PUBLIC ROADS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on Qanun Number 3 of 2021, The Kota Banda Aceh Government set new tariffs at several locations to increase local revenue. This qanun inspired the writer to examine the policy based on the maqāṣid al-syarī'ah review. This study is a normative legal research that uses maqāṣid as its approach. The author performs tarjih maslahat through four steps to test the validity of maqāṣid al-khalq. This study found that the Kota Banda Aceh Government has not improved the management of parking fees, so local revenue is not optimal. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, if optimizing parking management is not carried out first, then the rate increase is tertiary (al-maqāṣid al-taḥsīniyyāt). Based on the analysis of tarjih maslahat, the tertiary benefits should not undermine secondary benefits. In addition, the new parking rate policy has more dominant mafsadat effects than maslahat because management has not optimally prevented fraud. This study concluded that resisting damage is more important than realizing benefits. Thus, in this policy, there is a conflict between maqāṣid al-khalq and maqāṣid al-syarī'ah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".