ECKN: An Integrated Approach for Position Estimation, Packet Routing, and Sleep Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network lifetime and localization are critical design factors for a number of wireless sensor network (WSN) applications. These networks may be randomly deployed and left unattended for prolonged periods of time. This means that node localization is performed after network deployment, and there is a need to develop mechanisms to extend the network lifetime since sensor nodes are usually constrained battery-powered devices, and replacing them can be costly or sometimes impossible, e.g., in hostile environments. To this end, this work proposes the energy-aware connected k-neighborhood (ECKN): a joint position estimation, packet routing, and sleep scheduling mechanism. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of such integrated solutions to WSNs. The proposed localization algorithm performs trilateration using the positions of a mobile sink and already-localized neighbor nodes in order to estimate the positions of sensor nodes. A routing protocol is also introduced, and it is based on the well-known greedy geographic forwarding (GGF). Similarly to GGF, the proposed protocol takes into consideration the positions of neighbors to decide the best forwarding node. However, it also considers node residual energy in order to guarantee the forwarding node will deliver the packet. A sleep scheduler is also introduced in order to extend the network lifetime. It is based on the connected k-neighborhood (CKN), which aids in the decision of which nodes switch to sleep mode while keeping the network connected. An extensive set of performance evaluation experiments was conducted and results show that ECKN not only extends the network lifetime and localizes nodes, but it does so while sustaining the acceptable packet delivery ratio and reducing network overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".