MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4383315117 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.05.547852

pUdOs: concise plasmids for bacterial and mammalian cells

2023· preprint· en· W4383315117 on OpenAlexafffund
France Ourida Manigat, Louise B. Connell, Brittany N. Stewart, Abdel-Rahman LePabic, Christian Tessier, Johnathon R. Emlaw, Nicholas D. Calvert, Anthony Rössl, Adam J. Shuhendler, Corrie J.B. daCosta, François‐Xavier Campbell‐Valois

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPlasmidBiologyEscherichia coliPromoterExpression vectorGeneticsVector (molecular biology)Cloning vectorMultiple cloning siteTranscription (linguistics)Computational biologyGeneGene expressionRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The pUdOs are 28 plasmids of small size combining four different origins of replication and seven selection markers, which together afford flexible use in Escherichia coli and several related gram- negative bacteria. The promoterless multicloning site is insulated from upstream spurious promoters by strong transcription terminators, and contains type IIP or IIS restriction sites for conventional or Golden-gate cloning. pUdOs can be converted into efficient expression vectors through the insertion of a promoter at the user’s discretion. For example, we demonstrate the utility of pUdOs as the backbone for an improved version of a Type III Secretion System reporter in Shigella . In addition, we derive a series of pUdO-based mammalian expression vectors affording distinct levels of expression and transfection efficiencies comparable to commonly used mammalian expression plasmids. Thus, pUdOs could advantageously replace traditional plasmids in a wide variety of cell types and applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→