MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A clinical case of fitting scleral contact lenses for congenital bilateral eyelid coloboma complicated by exposure keratopathy

2023· article· en· W4383342233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Victoria Forbes, E. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe EYE GLAZ · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicOcular Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEyelidColobomaOphthalmologyVisual acuityCorneaContact lensAstigmatismCorneal topographySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Eyelid coloboma is a rare craniofacial pathology, that usually affects the patient congenitally. Eyelid coloboma in addition to being a cosmetic disfigurement, also affects the cornea, vision and if associated with other systemic abnormalities can cause severe morbidity. Complications of eyelid coloboma are mainly due to corneal exposure from large upper eyelid defects resulting in exposure keratopathy and corneal ulceration if left untreated. The aim of case study: to analyze a clinical case of bilateral upper eyelid coloboma complicated by exposure keratophathy and irregular astigmatism, resulting in low visual acuity in a 4-year-old girl. Description of the case. The patient was born with Manitoba-oculo-trichio-anal (MOTA) syndrome, which was accompanied by bifid nose and eyelid coloboma. The patient had multiple reconstructive surgeries. She was referred to the Miami Contact Lens Institute (MCLI) for Scleral Contact Lens fit (SCL). The examination revealed bilateral acquired infantile corneal opacities of mild density, which occluded the visual axis; complex hypermetropic astigmatism 6.5 diopters; high-grade amblyopia in both eyes -best corrected visual acuity was OD 0.13 and OS 0.05. Scleral contact lenses were fitted to prevent progressive symblepharon, protect the ocular surface, restore vision and to provide comfort due to the severity of dry eye. SCL’s had ideal clearance in the center and at the periphery and provided visual acuity OD 0.2 and OS 0.1. Conclusion. Patients with congenital anomalies are often difficult to treat, especially after multiple reconstructive eyelid surgeries. The mechanical effect of the eyelids on the cornea and the high risk of developing symblepharon and severe amblyopia influenced our decision to fit the patient with SCL. These lenses create a fluid reservoir that provides hydration, comfort, and protection to the exposed surface of the eye and restores vision. Ophthalmologists and pediatricians should pay more attention to the advantages of SCL specifically for patients that require corneal protection from exposure and mechanical damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe EYE GLAZSame topicOcular Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207