Successful Long-term Treatment of LPL Deficiency with MCT-enriched Diet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency is a genetic condition. Affected individuals typically develop symptoms before age 10 with severe hypertriglyceridemia. No pharmacological treatment has lowered triglyceride levels in LPL deficiency patients successfully. The purpose of this study is to report on clinical outcomes of patients with LPL deficiency who responded to dietary therapy with successful reduction of their triglyceride (TG) levels with a long-chain triglyceride (LCT)-restricted, medium-chain triglyceride (MCT)-supplemented diet. Methods: A single-center retrospective case review study of LPL deficiency patients who met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated at the Hospital of Sick Children between January 2000 to December 2022. Data collected include demographic and clinical data, biochemical profiles at diagnosis and after dietary treatment initiation, and molecular results. Results: The study included seven patients with a suspected diagnosis of LPL deficiency (hypertriglyceridemia > 20 mmol/L). Six patients had a confirmed molecular diagnosis of LPL deficiency, and one had a Glycogen storage disease 1a (GSD1a) diagnosis. After presenting with hypertriglyceridemia, an LCT-restricted and MCT-supplemented diet was initiated, resulting in immediate and sustained TG reduction in all LPL deficiency patients that adhered to the diet. Additionally, they all maintained excellent growth and development. LPL deficiency-related complications were not observed under the MCT-enriched diet, except for increased pancreatic enzymes in one patient after dietary error. As expected, the diet failed to treat hypertriglyceridemia in the GSD1 patient. Conclusions: The dietary restriction of LCT in combination with MCT supplementation was feasible and effective in the long-term management of patients with LPL deficiency. In our experience, this treatment eliminated LPL-related complications and led to good clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".