MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383498495 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ace55a

Impact of Calcium on Air Stability of Na[Ni<sub>1/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>]O<sub>2</sub> Positive Electrode Material for Sodium-ion Batteries

2023· article· en· W4383498495 on OpenAlexaff
Libin Zhang, Jay Deshmukh, Hussein Hijazi, Ziwei Ye, Michel B. Johnson, Andy George, J. R. Dahn, Michael Metzger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpurityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeSodiumIonChemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O3-type Na[Ni 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 ]O 2 is a promising positive electrode material for sodium-ion batteries. However, it suffers from structural degradation accompanied by surface-impurity growth during ambient storage and processing. In this study, we synthesized Na 1–2y Ca y [Ni 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 ]O 2 with y = 0 and 0.02, and studied their structural stability towards ambient exposure. Na 0.96 Ca 0.02 [Ni 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 ]O 2 demonstrated excellent air stability by retaining 0.93 of lattice Na in the original O3 structure after 6 days of ambient storage. Titration experiments confirmed that the presence of Ca in Na 0.96 Ca 0.02 [Ni 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 ]O 2 effectively suppressed the otherwise rigorous Na + /H + ion exchange in the presence of water. Charge/discharge cycling in half cells suggested that Ca improved the active material’s specific capacity and capacity retention by retaining its structural integrity and eliminating surface impurity formation during ambient electrode processing. Finally, the cycling performance of Na 0.96 Ca 0.02 [Ni 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 ]O 2 /hard carbon full cells was evaluated with upper cut-off voltages of 4.0 V and 4.1 V. Raising the upper cut-off voltage to 4.1 V resulted in a 20% gain in specific energy, but also accelerated capacity fade and voltage polarization, most likely due to an irreversible phase transition above 4.0 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207