MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383505044 · doi:10.4337/9781847201799.00026

Index

2006· paratext· en· W4383505044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2006
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Testing and Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6 achievement/ascription dimension of culture 65 achievement orientation measurement 81 as success factor 11, 68, 98, 100 women, Mexico 173-4 women, St Vincent 89 women, USA 153-4 see also motivation Adler, N. 38 advertising and gender discrimination, Mexico 165 age, impact on success 127 Canada 140-41 Alsop, Marin 220-21 Altus, W.D. 47 American nationality as success factor 157 Argentina 15, 17, 195-8 gender discrimination 203-5 success factors 61, 205-9 Successful Women study 200-209 women 198-200, 202-3 attributional theory of achievement motivation 35-6 attributions for success, women 35-6 Argentina 205-8 Canada 141-5 Mexico 176-80 St Vincent 85-6 USA 153-7 authoritarian leadership style 108

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it