MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383535335 · doi:10.31083/j.jin2204083

Correlation between Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) and Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients with Hypertension

2023· article· en· W4383535335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Neuroscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina International Medical Foundation
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaMedicinePolysomnographyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineHomocysteineBody mass indexCognitionCardiologyAtrial fibrillationApneaPhysical therapyCognitive impairmentDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common clinical disease that seriously affects the quality of life and health of patients. This study aimed to explore the correlation between OSAS and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with hypertension. Methods: A total of 106 elderly hypertensive patients were included and divided into OSAS group (n = 45) and non-OSAS group (n = 61), according to whether they combined with OSAS. OSAS was monitored with a portable polysomnography monitor by monitoring sleep and breathing. The cognitive dysfunction of the patients was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Basic data and MoCA scores of the patients were compared between the OSAS group and non-OSAS group. The correlation between OSAS and cognitive dysfunction in patients was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation analysis. Results: The proportion of men (38 vs. 22, p = 0.000), atrial fibrillation (31 vs. 19, p = 0.000), body mass index (27.32 ± 3.85 vs. 21.27 ± 5.90, p = 0.002), systolic pressure (167.76 ± 14.31 vs. 153.22 ± 12.79, p = 0.008), homocysteine (29.71 ± 6.27 vs. 12.50 ± 4.19, p = 0.005), cognitive dysfunction (15 vs. 10, p = 0.042) in patients of the OSAS group were significantly higher compared to patients of the non-OSAS group. Visual space/executive ability (3.12 ± 1.23 vs. 4.75 ± 1.03, p = 0.021), memory (2.48 ± 0.31 vs. 3.71 ± 0.42, p = 0.039), attention (4.15 ± 1.21 vs. 5.12 ± 1.87, p = 0.041), total MoCA scores (20.11 ± 5.09 vs. 25.76 ± 4.31, p = 0.017) in patients in the OSAS group were significantly lower compared to patients in the non-OSAS group. OSAS was positively correlated with cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with hypertension (r = 0.224, p < 0.05). Conclusions: OSAS was positively correlated with cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with hypertension, so OSAS could increase the risk of cognitive dysfunction through its own adverse effects or its accompanying disease status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it