MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4383536180 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.05.547859

Multiple Pleistocene refugia for Arctic White Heather ( <i>Cassiope tetragona</i> ) supported by population genomics analyses of contemporary and Little-Ice-Age samples

2023· preprint· en· W4383536180 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cassandra Elphinstone, Fernando Braz Tangerino Hernández, Marco Todesco, Jean‐Sébastien Légaré, Winnie Cheung, Paul C. Sokoloff, Annika Hofgaard, Casper T. Christiansen, Esther R. Frei, Esther Lévesque, Gergana N. Daskalova, Haydn J. D. Thomas, Isla H. Myers‐Smith, Jacob A. Harris, Jeffery M. Saarela, Jeremy L. May, Joachim Obst, Julia Boike, Karin Clark, Katie MacIntosh, Katlyn R. Betway, Mats P. Björkman, Michael L. Moody, Niels Martin Schmidt, Per Mølgaard, Robert G. Björk, Robert D. Hollister, Roger D. Bull, Sofie Agger, Vincent Maire, Liam Case, Greg H. R. Henry, Loren H. Rieseberg

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesCanadian Museum of NatureUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArcticNetWestern Canada Research GridCompute CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBeringiaArcticPopulationPleistoceneRefugium (fishkeeping)GeographyEcologySubspeciesLast Glacial MaximumBiologyGlacial periodPhysical geographyPaleontologyArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Arctic plants survived the Pleistocene glaciations in unglaciated refugia, but the number of these refugia is often unclear. We use high-resolution genomic data from present-day and Little-Ice-Age populations of Arctic White Heather ( Cassiope tetragona ) to re-evaluate the biogeography of this species and determine whether it had multiple independent refugia or a single refugium in Beringia. Location Circumpolar Arctic and Coastal British Columbia (BC) alpine Taxon Cassiope tetragona L., subspecies saximontana and tetragona, outgroup C. mertensiana (Ericaceae) Methods We built genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) libraries using Cassiope tetragona tissue from 36 Arctic locations, including two ∼250-500-year-old populations collected under glacial ice on Ellesmere Island, Canada. We assembled a de novo GBS reference and called variants in dDocent. Population structure, genetic diversity, and demography were inferred from PCA, ADMIXTURE, fastsimcoal2, SplitsTree, and several population genomics statistics. Results Population structure analyses identified 4-5 clusters that align with geographic locations. Nucleotide diversity was highest in Beringia and decreased eastwards across Canada. Demographic coalescent analysis of the site-frequency-spectrum dated the following splits from Alaska: BC subspecies saximontana (6 mya), Russia (1.5 mya), Europe (>300-600 kya), Greenland (100 kya). Northern Canada populations appear to be from the current interglacial (7-9 kya). Genetic variants from Alaska appeared more frequently in present-day than historic plants on Ellesmere Island. Conclusions Demographic analyses show BC, Alaska, Russia, Europe, and Greenland all had separate refugia during the last major glaciations. Northern Canadian populations appear to be founded during the current interglacial with genetic contributions from Alaska, Europe, and Greenland. On Ellesmere Island, there is evidence for continued, recent gene flow with foreign variants introduced in the last 250-500 years. These results suggest that a re-analysis of other Arctic species with shallow population structure using higher resolution genomic markers and demographic analyses may help reveal deeper structure and other circumpolar glacial refugia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→