Pengaruh Transfer Tunai Bersyarat terhadap Prevalensi Pekerja Anak
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Program Transfer tunai bersyarat (Conditional Cash Transfer/CCT) diterapkan secara luas sebagai kebijakan pengentasan kemiskinan di negara-negara berkembang, di mana tingkat kemiskinan rumah tangga tinggi. Program CCT dipandang sebagai intervensi yang relevan untuk mengatasi akar penyebab permasalahan pekerja anak. Studi ini bertujuan menganalisis seberapa jauh hubungan antara kebijakan transfer tunai bersyarat di Indonesia, Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH), dengan keputusan anak untuk bekerja, dengan menggunakan data Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) 2007 dan 2014 dan memfokuskan sampel pada anak usia 6-14 tahun. Dalam melakukan pengujian, penelitian ini diestimasi menggunakan metode linear probability model (LPM). Hasil estimasi mengungkapkan bahwa PKH komponen pendidikan secara signifikan justru berkorelasi terhadap kenaikan jumlah pekerja anak, dengan kecenderungan kenaikan partisipasi bekerja anak pada bisnis keluarga dengan tanpa memperoleh upah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it