MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383560140 · doi:10.4000/cher.15146

Les féministes et l’idéal national roumain de 1918

2023· article· fr· W4383560140 on OpenAlexaff
Anemari Monica Negru

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Société orthodoxe nationale des femmes roumaines a été une association culturelle, active de 1910 à 1948, dont les membres sont parvenus à fonder des jardins d’enfants, des écoles, des bibliothèques dans de nombreuses localités de Roumanie. Durant la Grande Guerre, les féministes, aussi bien celles qui sont restées dans le territoire occupé de la Roumanie (telles Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino, Zoe Gr. Râmniceanu, Zoe Rosetti-Bălănescu), que celles qui se sont refugiées en Moldavie (comme Maria Baiulescu, Elena Perticari, Maria Glogoveanu, Margot Oromolu), ont organisé et entretenu des hôpitaux pour les blessés, des refuges et des cantines pour les orphélins, ont porté correspondance avec les prisonniers de guerre de l’Empire Austro-Hongrois et d’Allemagne. L’article présente en particulier trois personnalités exemplaires parmi ces femmes d’exception : Elena Alistar, de Bessarabie, Maria Baiulescu de Transylvanie et Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino de Valachie, qui, en tant que leaders d’associations féministes, ont promu autour de 1918 les idéaux unionistes des Roumains à travers de nombreuses initiatives et actions : la fondation et l’unification d’associations de féministes, l’organisation de conférences, la publication de mémoires et d’article de presse à contenu unioniste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.354
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherchesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207