Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Société orthodoxe nationale des femmes roumaines a été une association culturelle, active de 1910 à 1948, dont les membres sont parvenus à fonder des jardins d’enfants, des écoles, des bibliothèques dans de nombreuses localités de Roumanie. Durant la Grande Guerre, les féministes, aussi bien celles qui sont restées dans le territoire occupé de la Roumanie (telles Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino, Zoe Gr. Râmniceanu, Zoe Rosetti-Bălănescu), que celles qui se sont refugiées en Moldavie (comme Maria Baiulescu, Elena Perticari, Maria Glogoveanu, Margot Oromolu), ont organisé et entretenu des hôpitaux pour les blessés, des refuges et des cantines pour les orphélins, ont porté correspondance avec les prisonniers de guerre de l’Empire Austro-Hongrois et d’Allemagne. L’article présente en particulier trois personnalités exemplaires parmi ces femmes d’exception : Elena Alistar, de Bessarabie, Maria Baiulescu de Transylvanie et Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino de Valachie, qui, en tant que leaders d’associations féministes, ont promu autour de 1918 les idéaux unionistes des Roumains à travers de nombreuses initiatives et actions : la fondation et l’unification d’associations de féministes, l’organisation de conférences, la publication de mémoires et d’article de presse à contenu unioniste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".