MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383599337 · doi:10.11648/j.cssp.20231101.12

A Web-based Least Significant Bit (LSB) Image Steganographic Technique

2023· article· en· W4383599337 on OpenAlexaff
Nimishkumar Baldha

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteganographyLeast significant bitSteganography toolsComputer scienceCover (algebra)EncryptionCommunication sourcePlaintextKey (lock)SteganalysisAuthentication (law)Image (mathematics)Information hidingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer securityComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steganography is the art of hiding secret messages into cover during communication. Steganography is a technique for sending secret messages across ordinary cover carriers in such a way that the presence of the messages is unnoticed. There are various steganographic techniques based on the cover being used in the steganographic process. The covers can be an image, audio, video, and text. The most widely used steganographic technique nowadays is Image Steganography. Image steganography is hiding the existence of the data using the image as the cover object. Most of the image steganographic technique hides the secret messages as plaintext and intruders may try to extract the secret message if he/she knows that the image being communicated is a stego image. In this paper, a web-based Least Significant Bit (LSB) image steganographic technique with two layers of AES encryption that does not require a key exchange mechanism between sender and receiver is explained. The proposed method follows six step mechanism on the sender’s side which includes user authentication to initiate communication, two 128-bit key generation and storing it to the central server database, message encryption using one of the generated keys in previous step and image encryption using another key followed by the image steganography. The image generated after sixth step is ready to send via any medium to the receiver. The receiver of the image also follows six steps process to convert the stego image to the decrypted message. After completing the authentication, receiver inputs the received image from the sebder and the system checks for the integrity of the inputted image. Once the integrity is verified, the system pulls the decryption keys from the database. Using this decryption keys, the image decryption and message takes place. The goal of the proposed method is to avoid key exchange mechanism using client/server architecture. The proposed method encrypts the secret message and stego image to add another layer of security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207