Exercise Testing in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To examine if cardiorespiratory requirements assess during the 6-minute walking test (6WT) and the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) before and after training are the same in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: 24 children with CP (16 boys and 8 girls, with the mean age of 14.2±2 years (10 to 16 years) classified at gross Motor Function Classification System level I and II were recruted from a school for special education in France. Participants were randomly assigned both the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the 6WT and were divided to either training group (n = 12) or the control group (n = 12). The training group met twice per week for 40 minutes of exercise training. Results: Cardiorespiratory data did not differ between the CPET and the 6WT before training (VO2 Peak: p=0.86; VE Peak: p=0.87 and HR Peak: p= 0.41) and after training (p=0,41, p=0,26 et p=0,65) respectively. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that cardiorespiratory responses obtained during the 6WT and the CPT before and after training did no differ in children with cerebral palsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".