A labeled spectral dataset with cassava disease occurrences using virus titre determination protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we present a novel dataset composed of spectral data and images of cassava crops with and without diseases. Together with the description of the dataset, we describe the protocol to collect such data in a controlled environment and in an open field where pests are not controlled. Crop disease diagnosis has been done in the past through the analysis of plant images taken with a smartphone camera. However, in some cases, disease symptoms are not visible. Furthermore, for some cassava diseases, once symptoms have manifested on the aerial part of the plant, the root which is the edible part of the plant has been totally destroyed. The goal of collecting this multimodality of the crop disease is early intervention, following the hypothesis that diseased crops without visible symptoms can be detected using spectral information. We collected visible and near-infrared spectra captured from leaves infected with two common cassava diseases namely; Cassava Brown Streak Disease and Cassava Mosaic Disease, as well as from healthy plants. Together, we also captured leaf imagery data that corresponds to the spectral information. In our experiments, biochemical data is collected and taken as the ground truth. Finally, agricultural experts provided a disease score per plant leaf from 1 to 5, 1 representing healthy and 5 severely diseased. The process of disease monitoring and data collection took 19 and 15 consecutive weeks for screenhouse and open field, respectively, until disease symptoms were visibly seen by the human eye.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".