PREREQUISITES FOR THE ADOPTION, CONTENT AND EVALUATION OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT OF CANADA, 1982 (TO THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines certain problems of the formation history of Canadian constitutionalism through the prism of the analysis of the prerequisites for the adoption and content of the Canadian Constitutional Act of 1982 and determines its place and influence in the world system of knowledge of a political and legal nature. As it is known, the constitution (from the Latin constitutio — establishment, system, order) is the main state document (law) that defines the state system, the order and principles of functioning of the representative, executive and judicial authorities, the electoral system, rights and obligations of a state, society and citizens. Usually, other laws of a particular state are based on the constitution. In addition, every modern written constitution grants specific powers to the organizations and public institutions established on the primary basis of compliance with the limitations of such a constitution. In most, but not all, modern states, the constitution takes precedence over the common law. Constitutions apply to a variety of levels, from sovereign states to the corporations and societies. An international treaty establishing international organizations is also their constitution in the scope that it defines how that organization is formed. For a state, whether sovereign or the subject of a federation, the constitution defines the principles on which the state is based and the order by which and who has the right to make laws. Some constitutions, especially codified ones, also act as restraints on the state power by establishing boundaries that state leaders cannot cross, i.e. fundamental rights. It is noted that today Canada is a constitutional monarchy, the head of state of which is the King or Queen of Great Britain. Canada officially belongs to the so-called «strong federations», in which parts of the federation have significant rights and responsibilities, some of the decisions of the central government shall be carried out by the provinces, but their activities are regulated by a series of agreements and laws, and disputes are often resolved by judicial authorities. All of Canada's provinces have unicameral parliaments and generally follow the same rules as the lower house of Canada's federal parliament. Considerable attention is paid to the fact that the Canadian constitution is the legal basis of the state and consists of both written text and unwritten traditions and agreements. The Constitution also includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees basic rights and freedoms to citizens. In Canada, the constitution refers to a compilation of acts, British laws, court decisions, etc. The two main documents are the British North America Act of 1867, which declared Canada a dominion of Great Britain, and the 1982 act, which established that all laws passed in Canada did not require formal confirmation by the British Parliament.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".