Type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene GRK5 regulates physiological pancreatic β-cell proliferation via phosphorylation of HDAC5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Restoring functional β cell mass is a potential therapy for those with diabetes. However, the pathways regulating β cell mass are not fully understood. Previously, we demonstrated that Sox4 is required for β cell proliferation during prediabetes. Here, we report that Sox4 regulates β cell mass through modulating expression of the type 2 diabetes (T2D) susceptibility gene GRK5 . β cell-specific Grk5 knockout mice showed impaired glucose tolerance with reduced β cell mass, which was accompanied by upregulation of cell cycle inhibitor gene Cdkn1a . Furthermore, we found that Grk5 may drive β cell proliferation through a pathway that includes phosphorylation of HDAC5 and subsequent transcription of immediate-early genes (IEGs) such as Nr4a1 , Fosb , Junb , Arc , Egr1 , and Srf . Together, these studies suggest GRK5 is linked to T2D through regulation of β cell growth and that it may be a target to preserve β cells during the development of T2D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".