An amino acid-resolution interactome for motile cilia illuminates the structure and function of ciliopathy protein complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motile cilia are ancient, evolutionarily conserved organelles whose dysfunction underlies motile ciliopathies, a broad class of human diseases. Motile cilia contain myriad different proteins that assemble into an array of distinct machines, so understanding the interactions and functional hierarchies among them presents an important challenge. Here, we defined the protein interactome of motile axonemes using cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL/MS) in Tetrahymena thermophila . From over 19,000 XLs, we identified 4,757 unique amino acid interactions among 1,143 distinct proteins, providing both macromolecular and atomic-scale insights into diverse ciliary machines, including the Intraflagellar Transport system, axonemal dynein arms, radial spokes, the 96 nm ruler, and microtubule inner proteins, among others. Guided by this dataset, we used vertebrate multiciliated cells to reveal novel functional interactions among several poorly-defined human ciliopathy proteins. The dataset therefore provides a powerful resource for studying the basic biology of an ancient organelle and the molecular etiology of human genetic disease. Highlights Over 4,700 distinct amino-acid cross-links reveal the composition, structural organization, and conformational dynamics of proteins in motile ciliary axonemes. Dense interaction networks are defined for tubulins, Intraflagellar Transport complexes, axonemal dyneins, radial spokes, the CCDC39/40 96nm molecular ruler, and other complexes. These data reveal the placement of multiple adenylate kinases in the central apparatus and radial spokes of motile axonemes, a new microtubule-associated protein complex of CFAP58 and CCDC146, and insights into the activity of ciliopathy protein MAATS1/CFAP91. The data also provide the first known molecular defect resulting from loss of the human ciliopathy protein ENKUR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".