Prevalence and Correlates of HIV Disclosure Without Consent Among Women Living With HIV in Metro Vancouver, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study identified the prevalence and perpetrators of HIV disclosure without consent, and social-structural correlates, among women living with HIV (WLWH). Data were drawn from 7 years (September 14 to August 21) of a longitudinal community-based open cohort of cis and trans WLWH living and/or accessing care in Metro Vancouver, Canada. The study sample included 1871 observations among 299 participants. Overall, 160 (53.3%) women reported lifetime HIV disclosure without consent at baseline, and 115 (38.5%) reported HIV disclosure without consent in the previous 6 months during 7 years of follow-up. In a subanalysis (n = 98), the most common perpetrators of HIV disclosure without consent were friends, people in the community, family, health professionals, and neighbors. In multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations, recent (last 6 months) housing insecurity [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.43, 95% confidence interval: (1.10–1.86)], minoritized sexual identities (LGBQ2S) [AOR: 1.84 (1.22–2.78)], recently being treated, monitored, or diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder [AOR: 1.37 (0.98–1.92)], and experiencing physical symptoms related to HIV [AOR: 1.75 (1.25–2.44)] was positively associated with recent disclosure without consent. In a context where HIV nondisclosure before sex is criminalized unless viral load is low and a condom is used, it is concerning that a large proportion of women have experienced HIV disclosure without consent. Laws should focus on protecting rights of WLWH, promoting equity, guaranteeing sexual and reproductive rights, and ensuring access to essential services and privacy. Findings highlight the need for trauma-informed approaches among health and housing services that are responsive to intersections of violence and stigma, and include a focus on confidentiality, autonomy, and safe disclosure practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".